Andrea Gamiz vs Tsvetana Pironkova Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L L W L W
Form
L W W W L W W L L LHead-To-Head: Gamiz 1 - 0 Pironkova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gamiz winning 2 and Pironkova winning 0. The last match between Gamiz and Pironkova was at the Sony Swedish Open Women - Bastad, 16-07-2013, First, Clay with Andrea Gamiz getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrea Gamiz | 1 |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | 0 |
Sony Swedish Open Women - Bastad(16-07-2013)
6
1
6
3
| Gamiz | Stats | Pironkova |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 855 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 244 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 32 | Age | 37 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 3 |
| 56% (439-338) | Career Total W/L | 53% (367-324) |
| $16,320 | Career Prize Money | $3,133,220 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Andrea Gamiz
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:26:22 | Average Match Time | 1:26:22 |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Serve % | 48% (29/60) |
| 70% (31/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (1/8) |
| 52% (31/60) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tsvetana Pironkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Emma Raducanu
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Monica Niculescu
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
84%
(
83 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tsvetana Pironkova
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (439/338) | Win/Loss | 53% (367/324) |
| 56% (985/789) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (852/724) |
| 53% (8448/7529) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7503/6976) |
| 50% (63/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (132/135) |
| 58% (367/263) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (117/99) |
| 43% (9/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (68/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (50/35) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 149 | Aces Total | 1105 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 713 | Total Double Faults | 1035 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 576.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.46 |
| 73% (20476/27974) | 1st Serve % | 58% (20077/34810) |
| 56% (11492/20476) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12675/20077) |
| 45% (3364/7498) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6803/14719) |
| 51% (1967/3834) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1924/4128) |
| 49% (13565/27923) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15149/34070) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 52% (60/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (51/78) |
| 42% (11/15) | Cups W/L | 52% (15/14) |
| 34% (13/25) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (172/148) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (267/239) | Challenger W/L | 71% (69/28) |
| 71% (148/59) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (434/769) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (360/683) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (82/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/150) |
| 50% (111/221) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (76/200) |
| 84% (446/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (409/330) |
| 16% (446/71) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (409/79) |
| 19% (331/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (282/36) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
